1. The last word of the first line is sometimes
translated as bug, cockroach, or insect, but Kafka intended it to be “vermin.”
Definition for vermin: “Vermin is a term given to animals which are considered
by humans to be pests or nuisances, most associated with the carrying of
disease. Disease-carrying rodents and insects are the usual case but the term
can also apply to larger animals, on the basis that they exist out of
ecological balance with their environment.” Why did Kafka leave the term abstract? What might the bug transformation
symbolize?
2. Who is to blame for
Gregor’s metamorphosis? Why does the metamorphosis take place? What
things are left unexplained? Why do you think Kafka left them unexplained?
Do you have sympathy for Gregor? Do you
have sympathy for his family? Why or why not? How does the Samsa family’s life change after Gregor is transformed into
an insect? In what ways has it remained the same?
3. How does Gregor’s
metamorphosis goes hand in hand with a description of the world around him as
he sees it in his new state? What did Kafka try to express through the metamorphosis of Gregor Samsa?
What is the point of the novella (if any)?
4. Kafka said, “Great antipathy to Metamorphosis.
Unreadable ending. Imperfect almost to its very marrow.” (quoted in
Introduction to Everyman’s edition, page xv, written by Gabriel Josipovici) What do you think about the ending? What were
your reactions to the entire novella?
5. What is the effect of Kafka's matter-of-fact assertion of the bizarre
incidents with which the story begins? How does Kafka keep the way it came to
pass from becoming a major issue in the story?
How do you view the reactions
of Gregor's parents to their first view of his metamorphosis? What
circumstances in ordinary life might elicit a similar response?
6. What symbolic objects or other details appear in the story? Do they
have connections with earlier mythologies or legends or literature? How does
this story compare with other transformation stories or animal stories we are
studying? What makes the narrative approach of this modern story different from
a folktale?
7. The Metamorphosis has
been read and interpreted in many ways – as an example of existentialist
philosophy, a depiction of man’s condition in the modern world, Marxist
approach (Gregor’s work has dehumanized him), a presentation of psychological neurosis, feminist
approach to the story (the women take on the main work), and as a theological parable (a
martyr that is example of human suffering, apple is guilt, etc.). Discuss these possible interpretations.
8. Expressionism was an
aesthetic movement of the early 20th century. It focused on
distorting and magnifying the shape of reality in order to express a higher
order of emotional reality beneath the surface. It assumes, like many of the
major movements of modern art and literature, that art based predominately on
visible reality is inadequate. German Expressionism’s features include the
following: the distortion of surfaces, the obsession with the inner life, and
the relationship between the individual and authority (especially the conflict
between fathers and sons). How is Kafka’s Metamorphosis similar to
Expressionism?
Metamorphosis Discussion:
Instructions: When formulating your response to
the assigned question, know that I’m expecting a complete and original answer.
Your answer should be of at least twelve sentences with a thesis statement,
topic sentences, explanations and examples to prove your point. After posting,
you will respond to three classmates' posts; when responding to your
classmates' posts, you must choose a topic/question that you did not write
about. Your response should either agree or disagree with the posting while
also illuminating or adding to the dialogue in a meaningful way (approximately
five to seven sentences).
1 = B
2 = C
3 = D & F
4 = G & K
5 = M
6 = N & P
7 = R & S
8 = T & W
Question #2
ReplyDeleteThe author never stated who or what was the cause of Gregors transformantion. A lot of thing are unexplained like why Gregors family is poor and why he even had to the transformation. I think maybe the author did this on purpose becuase he wanted to reader to use their emagination and interpret the story on thier own. Yes, I have sympahty for Gregor because he's going through so many changes but I am really glad that he gets to have a break from his job. I dont have sympathy for his family becuase they need to give Gregor a break. They treat his like and slave and they are too dependent on him. Samsa's families life changed
Could it be possible that the cause of Gregor's transformation and many of the other things left unexplained were purposely left out of the story? Could these details have been excluded in order to convey a sense of absurdity in the story? I believe so. I believe that The Metamorphosis could serve as a commentary on the absurdity of life in this chaotic world. Kafka was an existentialist who believed that the the quest for meaning in life was a personal affair. This could belief could have left him to portray the world in his story as a cold, meaningless place void of meaning. In Kafka's mind, this may mirror the world we live in. In this Kafka may be saying that meaning may be a tough thing to fish out of the chaos of life.
DeleteDerrick I believe that you are correct that the author did not give the information about what caused his transformation and I believe that the reason why he did it was because there could be many interpretations on how and why and all these other possibilities. It depends on what way you interpret the literature.
DeleteHey Derrick! I do agree with you on the fact that Gregor's family should ease up on him a little. I think if they were in the shoes of Gregor then things would have played out differently.
Delete7.) The Metamorphosis has been read and interpreted in many ways including the Marxist approach (Gregor's work has dehumanized him). In this interpretation by Gregor having to support his family dehumanizes him and doesn't let him really live his own life. He cares more about supporting his family than him own self. Another approach is the feminist approach which is converyed in the novel when Grete takes full responsibility of taking care of Gregor. This shows that as a woman she is taking on the main work of the house. Lastly, there is a theological parable in the Metamorphosis when Grete is suffering because she has to constantly take care of Gregor. By the apple getting stuck in his back indicates guilt of not being able to take care of himself and provide for the family
ReplyDeleteAfter the tranformation because they had to become independent and their daughter had to start working.
ReplyDeleteI think that Kafka decided to leave it abstract so that the reader is able to imagine what Gregor has morphed into. Maybe Kafka wants the transformation to be the first thing that the reader thinks of when they think of the word vermin. For example someone may pensive vermin as a rat, bug, or insect. It all depends on the readers perspective of what Gregor has changed into. I think the bug transformation symbolizes that life is short so we should spend the little time we have on this earth, in this life, we should spend doing something that makes us happy. When Gregor became a bug his family rejected him, he couldn't go to work, he couldn't help anyone with the house, and he was just more work for his sister. So really Gregor would just stay in his room and no one should live a life stuck in a room. It could also mean that after one life ends you start another like reincarnation. Like when your human life ends you start one of an animal.
ReplyDeleteI had a similar interpretation to yours. Whereas you implied that Kafka may be trying to say that life is short and that we should seize the day because, well you know. Yolo. :P. I think that Kafka may be saying that life is unpredictable and, at times, absurd. As a result, I believe we should strive to find the meaning in it and act upon the principles acquired during our quest. By doing this, we can become the change we wish to see in the world and therefore, derive meaning from this insane life.
DeleteIt also symbolizes knowledge of good and bad and that he is realizing how much of a burden he is to his family.
ReplyDeleteGregor's metamorphosis goes hand in hand with a description of the world around him as he sees it in his new state by actual standing still and observing everything. Gregor sees how his family actual feels about him. After Gregor horrified the office manager Gregor's father acted by anger. He chases Gregor back into his room. Another example of his father's feeling toward him was when Gregor accidentally scared him mother and she passes out. His father start throwing apple at him. One was lodged into his back which put a whole in his back. Gregor's sister for the most part was the only one he could relate to until the three gentleman declared they were no longer renting the room. She turned on him and declare that Gregor had to go. His mother couldn't believe that that vermin was her son. Gregor sees that he was nothing but income to his family. He sees that once he was no longer taking care of his family. He was no longer important
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Decoria that Gregor comes to realization of how his family really feels about him. That even before his metamorphosis he was dehumanized but didn't become aware of it himself until after his transformation and his family actually had to take care of him, which was something they weren't use to because Gregor mainly suuported the family and also himself.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete.6)
ReplyDeleteSome symbolic objects in the story are food,the picture of the woman in furs, and hisThe food represent how the family feels toward Gregor. For example his father wounded him with an apple, which led to Gregors death. The picture of the woman in the furs relates to Gregors once humanity. He put it on his wall while he was still human to he has a connectivity to the picture. The picture is the only thing left that allows him to cling to his human past which is why he didn't let his mother and Grete take it away. The last symbol was his father's uniform . The uniform represents his father's dignity but also the pity Gregor has for his father.One novel that reminds me of a transformation was The Pearl during the plot the main character becomes a self centered person after the death of his son, but then changes back to a loving person after He finds a pearl to pay off all of his debts.It actually has a reality to it with actions of real humans though it involves Gregor transforming to a bug.
I agree with your symbolic objects and their meaning to the story. I agree that even though Gregor was transformed into an insect he was still human. He had feelings, thoughts, and he remembered the times when he was a human. He remembers when he used to do his assignments as a young boy. That thought process was what he still had and the mentality to remember his young childhood years.
DeleteI agree with your objects and how they repersent the story. Even though he wasn't the same physically he was the same mentally. His life is reunion and he has all these memories as a human
DeleteIn the story there are many symbolic object. One symbolic object is Gregor when he is transformed into the enormous insect. Another symbolic object is the title and the whole transformation is the major symbolism in the literature because it is bad transformation for him because he sees how his family does not care for him and finally knows that he is going to do better when he leaves. The apple represented how his life was from having a happy life to going bad all the way to death. It does have connections with a lot of literature. In literature they express the who people are tried like nothing and it is shown here how his family are disgusted by him and his appearance and even though he is still family they do not love him even after his transformation. Which shows how he sacrifices for his family yet they do not care. The story is like Jane eyre, Jane is isolated in the beginning of the story and is treated bad then when she meets Rochester she becomes a lot caring and loving plus Rochester went from being angry at everything to a happy and joyful man. It is different because of how really life the story is. In the story it show the family struggling like we are now and that in times now that some families do not care about their family members. In folk tales it is completely different.
ReplyDeleteOverall this is a good post. However, I do not understand the way Jane Eyre fits into this story. Gregor didn't have a happy ending, as Jane Eyre did. There was no one to rescue him because he was all alone and a giant bug. Gregor's life relates to Franz Kafka's life because he too was alienated.
DeleteAllison Milian
ReplyDeleteN5). In the beginning of the Metamorphosis, Kafka plainly states that Gregor woke up from disturbed dreams. At first, the reader is disoriented, believing that Gregor is dreaming of being an insect. Then, realization hits, and the reader understands that Gregor has actually become a giant insect, and that that is the reality in which he lives in. Because Kafka introduced it in the very beginning, Gregor's becoming an insect doesn't become an issue because the reader never really views him as a human, but as the insect he woke up as. In a way, this makes the reader dehumanize Gregor. When Gregor's parents first see him, his mother kind of breaks, feeling like her son died. His Dad is really accepting of it though. He instantly views Gregor as vermin, forgetting that his son ever existed. Grete begins to care for him, the same way he was the caretaker of the family before that morning. His parents are sad about it, but mainly because they lost their main source of income and now have to work again. Instances that might illicit the same response in real life might be the announcement of a change in sexuality, a world event caused by a certain religion, anything that completely changes the view a person or people have on something or someone.
Gregor is indeed dehumanized right from the start of the novella. He never once makes an appearance as a human. Upon Gregor's transformation, his mother reacts as if her son has died and never even begins to ponder how she might transform her son back into a human. She immediately accepts her son's "passing" and begins to move on. Gregor's father, upon realizing that his son has changed, and without a second thought, views him as vermin. Gregor's mother's and his father's reactions, and the lack of a human appearance on his part, serve to dehumanize him. Why would Kafka want to dehumanize Gregor so?
DeleteQuestion #5
ReplyDeleteIn the beginning of the the story Kafka wanted to start the story out with kind of a nice waking up in the morning feeling for not only for the character but for the reader as well, but then Kafka decides to immediately puts in a bizarre situation with Gregor realizing that he has been transformed into some sort of vermin. Kafka does not really make Gregor's transformation a major deal in way because in the beginning he just awoke as the vermin he turned into and the reason he did not make this a big deal because Kafka wants to mainly focus on the family on there actions and reactions to Gregor's transformation because mainly his family's actions and reactions make up this story. Well my reaction to Gregor's parents, I was pretty astonished at they way they reacted because all they cared about is when will Gregor get out of his room to begin work, they only worried about his job, they didn't really care about his health or well being, and this shows how lazy and dependent his parents are. In some circumstances in real life, it all depends on the type of people you live with, for example there could be a family were they force there own daughter or son to give up school and start working to provide for the family and sometimes those family's can be abusive when it comes to that situation, In the story it kind of picks up from the example but It just leaves out just a little part of abuse.
I agree with your post.I also believe that Kafka didn't make a big deal out of the transformation, which should be a big deal because that never happens, instead he puts all his attention on the way Gregor's family perceives this situation to show readers how little his family really loved him. Immediately they treated like what he was, a vermin.
Delete1)
ReplyDeleteKafka might have used "vermin" as an abstract term because Gregor was both a large, disgusting insect and a nuisance to his family. He was also out of ecological balance with his environment. Gregor's family did not want to be around or even look at him because they thought he was repulsive. They did not like having to take care of him. Gregor was a human sized bug in a house full of humans. His needs as an insect were different from his needs as a human. A house is not a suitable environment for an insect of his size. This bug transformation might be a symbolization of the way Kafka was treated. Kafka was Jewish and he lived in Germany. He felt alienated. Gregor was thought of as disgusting and he was also alienated.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI agree with your description of what a vermin is, even I was disgusted as we were reading this novella and I couldn't even see what he looked like. The family seemed to make Gregor feel that taking care of him was like a job no one wanted anything to do with. Great post!
DeleteI agree with your post, if Gregor as the victim of the transformation was disgusted I can't imagine what other would've reacted to his appearance. Even though I feel sympathy for Gregor I think I would've reacted like everyone else and not want to be associated with someone who looked like an insect. It comes in human nature to not want to be associated with someone who's appearance isn't normal, because of what others will think about you. I agree, that this story might have reflected Kafka's life and how he was identified as not normal and weird. Along with Witney's post this story must have been some type of feeling associated with the Holocaust.
DeleteI agree with you competley it does comes to human nature that humans don't affiliate with animals
DeleteI also agree with you and liked how you made a connection between The Metamorphosis and Kafka's life. They both were being dehumanized and felt as if the whole word was against them. This is also how a vermin probably feels because no one really enjoys there company and sees no purpose in them. This shown by the way Gregor's family treats him and also how Kafka was Jewish and lived in Germany.
DeleteEveryone goes through a "metamorphosis", whether it is spiritually or physically. In Gregor's case, physically. Gregor Samsa's metamorphosis goes hand and hand with a description of the world around him as he sees it in his new state by the fact that he sees his room and house through the eyes of a vermin. Everything surrounding him small, but is always getting in his way. Kafka tries to express through the metamorphosis of Gregor that once you change yourself whether it is intentionally or on accident there will be a possibility that someone will not want to associate with you anymore. Basically Franz Kafka is saying no matter how much you may think a person likes you or how much you may trust that person they will eventually do something horrible to you when you least expect it. From a broader view, Kafka is expressing his feelings about being Jewish during a horrible time. Some people believe that The Metamorphosis was an allegory of the Holocaust. Or maybe he is showing readers how he felt alone because people often thought he was an unattractive, weird person. All in all, there are many ways of looking at this story. The point of the novella and Gregor's metamorphosis is that Gregor's life is the same as it was before his transformation, insignificant. I believe Gregor's life was insignificant because he wasn't really living, he was simply a void. Working from day to night at a job he hated to provide for his family who didn't even appreciate him.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your post, once you change some people will accept your new change and other won't. You can't please everyone. Gregor is a great example of how even ones own family will stop associating with you due to your new appearance. If even ones family is capable of that what will acquaintances not be capable of. They'll ignore you and they will talk about you. Gregor's transformation was not his fault. I liked your response to the question :)
DeleteWow Whitney! I must say that I 100% agree with what you stated. I believe that Kafka is right in a way about the person that you trust in the one that can possibly cause your downfall. But then I think that sometimes you have to take leaps of faith and if you end up falling then you can get back up again and learn from those mistakes.
DeleteIs**
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete2)
ReplyDeleteThe story does not question, or explain how and why this transformation has taken place it has been left unknown. Kafka has left the readers with those questions. In my opinion, the possibility of someone being turned into an insect from night to day is just absurd. The author never explains why this has occurred was it an illness or a punishment. Which, I don't think Gregor should have received since he was a great son and brother being the only one working and supporting his family having to withstand a job he disliked. I have sympathy for Gregor, because he was a great son and brother and to have something so horrid occur to him is just not fair. But, the metamorphosis also, gave Gregor a break from so much work and stress. So it was both good and bad. Not only did Gregor have to deal with his appearance and not knowing to how to adapt to his new body, but also being isolated from his family and having no support from them when he needed it the most. I would've had sympathy for his family if they would've cared about Gregor instead of treating him like they didn't even know him or as if he wasn't part of their family. The family changed with Gregor transformation, they keep him in his room and don't allow his own mother to see him and the father even injured him with an apple. The family still didn't have sympathy for Gregor they even treated him worse then before the transformation had occurred. They seemed more relieved once Gregor died. The family took a trolley ride out to the countryside and with Gregor's condition they were left with substantial savings and they decided to move to a better apartment. Grete, the family even decides that Grete needs a husband and they are now concerned with that and not Gregor's death.
4) Part One- I interpreted the novella The Metamorphosis as a dark one. The ending served as a major contribution to this notion. After everything that happened, the family moves on as if nothing had happened. They even go so far as to replace Gregor with Grete. Considering this and many other details throughout it, I believe the story may serve as a commentary on the absurdity of life in this world. First, Gregor wakes up as a "monstrous vermin" one morning. This is never explained, and even seems counterintuitive. Gregor is the sole provider for his family and works very hard to support and please them. He seems to be a relatively good person. Keeping this in mind rules out his transformation as some sort of punishment for his wrongdoings. His transformation seems to have occurred for no reason at all. Absurd reactions on part of the characters also contribute to the weirdness of the novella, but even seem to suggest that it is normal and that it is to be expected (they act as if they are desensitized), challenging the common notion that things happen for a reason; rather furthering the story's absurdness by suggesting that unlikely and unfortunate events occur so often that they have come to be expected. For example, while Gregor appears concerned about his transformation, it seems as if he is concerned about the most bizarre things relating to it, like getting in trouble at work, and does not even consider pursuing the cause of his change or how to restore his former self. All of the characters in the novella (with the exception of the Samsas' first maid, who begs to be fired out of fear for Gregor's new incarnate) share this aloof and desensitized nature throughout the story. Their reactions seem very unrealistic, as if they have distanced themselves from the truly horrifying breadth of the situation. When one considers the popular saying "insanity is a sane reaction to an insane environment," he is quickly able to realize that the characters in The Metamorphosis are likely not to be mentally sound, and that this may be an observation made by Kafka in the real world. Through his story, he may be attempting to convey the idea that we are likely not fully aware of the insanity of our environment simply due to the lack of the mental capacity required to become aware of it.
ReplyDeleteSimilarly to how the man who has his eyes opened to reality in Plato's Allegory of the Cave is shunned and ridiculed by his fellow cave mates when he attempts to enlighten them of the true nature of things, so to are those deemed "insane" or "mentally ill" by the truly blind (every day people) in our modern society. He may be implying that we distance ourselves emotionally from horrifying or monstrous occurrences so that we do not have to deal with their emotionally burdensome weight. This is not likely to be by choice, rather by instinct. Cavemen had not sufficient time to be emotional about things. They had to remain detached if they wished to survive. Emotion takes time, which may not always be available in a survival situation. Unfortunately, our bodies and brains have held on to this mindset over the millennia. They still perceive the world we live in as a dog-eat-dog type of place. Therefore, we tend to be emotionally withdrawn not by choice, but by instinct. It is this emotional distance which keeps us from realizing the truly absurd nature of things. This explains the seemingly aloof attitudes of the Samsas after Gregor's transformation. After Gregor's death, his parents invest themselves emotionally into his sister, Grete, but not without ending the novella with a sense of absurdity. They not only move on as if everything that happened was normal, but both challenge and corroborate the theme of emotional detachment. They demonstrate emotional distancing in their ability to quickly forget Gregor and move on. However, they challenge this theme by putting emotional stock into Grete. Perhaps Kafka said “Great antipathy to Metamorphosis. Unreadable ending. Imperfect almost to its very marrow.” because the ending somewhat contradicts the message put forth by the rest of the novel making it "unreadable" and "imperfect." However, it is possible for this apparent contradiction to be interpreted as a furthering of the notion of an absurd world. Why would people act in such contradictory ways as to quickly forget a loved one yet become attached to another?
ReplyDeleteQuestion #7
ReplyDeleteThe metamorphosis has many possible interpretations which include an existentialist philosophy, which is a depiction of man’s condition in the modern world, a Marxist approach (Gregor’s work has dehumanized him), a presentation of psychological neurosis, a feminist approach to the story, and as a theological parable. The existentialist philosophy interpretation shows is about a man's condition in the modern world. Gregor is a bug in this modern world who was a slave to his own work and now a slave to his own body and family. He is dehumanized by his condition of being a bug and by his job, which requires him to do a lot of work for his ungrateful family which brings in the Marxist approach in interpreting The Metamorphosis. He is dehumanized by his condition in his role as a part of his family and of his job. The psychological neurosis interpretation can be made by the fact that Gregor has changed into a giant bug and not knowing for sure whether it is all in the characters head or in reality if he really has turned into a giant insect. The possibility of his transformation into the bug being in Gregor's mental state is the reason why the literature can be interpreted by a psychological neurosis approach. A feminist's viewpoint of The Metamorphosis can be made the role that Gregor plays. He is a male and the sole provider of the family which goes to show that the women do not have that responsibility. Before Gregor it was his father who was the provider of the family. Another viewpoint in the feminist's point of view could be what Gregor's sister Grete does. She somewhat takes care of Gregor in his time of need which shows the caring nature of a women or girl. A theological parable interpretation of The Metamorphosis could be a use of symbolism in the literature. The apple for instance shows guilt and the guilt of the family or of Gregor's for not being able to carry through with his role. Gregor's suffering can be an example of a martyr because he suffers for his family which he was trying to help at all costs but in the end his suffering went without meaning.
Metamorphosis-the process of transformation from an immature form to an adult form in two or more distinct stages; in our lives we go through a change from our first words as a youth to driving or first car. In a sense everyone goes through a “Metamorphosis “or a change. Gregor’s metamorphosis goes hand in hand with the description of the world around him as he sees it now in a new perspective as looking at different things from a whole new set of eyes so to speak. For example he looks at his room, his family and his house through the eyes of a small insect. He is surrounded by large things and everywhere that he turns an obstacle seems to be in his way. Through the Metamorphosis Kafka expresses when you have gone through a change, even if you changed yourself on purpose or allowed someone to change you some people will not affiliate themselves with you or want to be around you. Mr. Kafka is emphasizing that even if you really believe in someone or maybe even trust them fully at any point in your life that person can turn on you. In a way readers interpreted Metamorphosis as an allegory of the Holocaust, Kafka may have been expressing how he felt about being Jewish during that time. The point of Novella and the metamorphosis of Gregor is that before anything happened to Gregor he was living the same life, meaningless. Gregor’s life was somewhat meaningless because he was living for someone else and not for himself. I believe that there is a purpose for everyone and everything so it is difficult to sum up the conclusion of Gregor’s life being meaningless.
ReplyDeleteResponse to Whitney:
ReplyDeleteI really liked what you said. Kafka made Gregor's life seem insignificant. His only purpose was to support his family. I like the way you related Kafka's life to how Gregor is treated in the story. I think Kafka purposefully tried to reflect his life and how he was treated onto Gregor.
Metamorphosis is similar to expressionism because the way gregor's metamorphosis went. The way expresionism is explained in the meaning helps to explain this even better. Expressionism is the distortion or tansformation of something. Gregor was a human and transoformed into a bug this is a complete example of distortion. As we can see none of his family wanted to do with hime because they were thinking were to good to talk to a bug. There obssesion with gregor supporting them and bring money in the house but it all changed in his transformation. Now they don't want nothing to do with him because he looks and is shaped diffrent from them. His father to me is lazy and gets no respect from me. I underdstand that he's getting older but now his family doesn't have anymore income come in he has to step up and get a job. Stop depending on others. It seems to me like gregor has all the athourity because everyone is depending on him. That's said because the father should be the leader of the family. After his transformatiin they thought he was useless and he found out all they wanted was money.
ReplyDeleteQuestion 1
ReplyDeleteThe ending of the story was very vague to me, not know for what reason he was transformed in to a hideous vermin made the story confusing. His family isolated him and locked him away in his room, kept him hidden from society and wanted no part of him. Throughout his human life, his family used him, they treated him as a slave and made him feel worthless, Gregor hated his life, he was working for everyone in the house and his parents depended on him to support them. He did not like how he was treated and made it clear that Gregor liked that he was transformed. Gregor liked the fact that he was transformed into a bug, due to the fact that he no longer had the responsibility to work and maintain his family, he no longer had to wake up in the early hours of dawn for work. Gregor felt sorrow of the fact that he was being ignored, and that his family wanted him around no more, when in his human life, they needed him for everything. To me, his family was abnormal, they had mixed feelings for Gregor, because his family at one point wanted to get rid of him, they had every opportunity to obliterate him but decided not too. Gregor being transformed made it clear to know who his parents were and how they felt of him, all they cared about was money and not of Gregor supporting the family. If his parents cared about Gregor, they would of but in the effort to find a cure. I did not like how the story ended, the fact that Gregor was killed made the story less interesting, the story would of been more bright if he would of lived, moved on and live his life as a bug in nature. My reaction to the novella was not not great, why? Because of all how it ended and how Gregor was treated among his family. What I did like in the story though was how his sister would feed him and would always give him a signal to him, letting him know she was coming
5)The effect of Kafka's matter-of-fact assertion of the bizarre incidents with which the story begin is that, it takes an abnormal situation and allows it to assume as a relatively normal occurrence. This is due to the reader not knowing Gregor as a person, just vermin, in turn, it becomes the norm for Gregor to be an insect instead of a human because. This is also assisted by mostly all of the characterization for Gregor were depicting him as inhuman, whether it's him being a slave at work in the past or a isolated insect in the present.
ReplyDeleteKafka keeps how Gregor became an insect from being a major issue in the story by presenting as a mystery to Gregor as well. The story once it is stated Gregor was really an insect the story quickly shifted to concerns about Gregor's job.Also, Kaka did not directly confront the transformation's cause, he just states that Gregor initially thought it was a dream but soon found out it was true. I believe he does this to add an element of mystery, or to skip over trivial details to further concentrate on the main idea if the story.
I view the reactions of Gregor's parents to their first view of his transformation as understandable, if not under reacting. I think isolating and dehumanizing Gregor is what a normal person would do in that given situation. A spontaneous transformation of a family member in to an insect would make any one want to get rid of him, however it is still a loved one so I can justify not killing him. On the other hand, I believe despite being their son, most people would have killed Gregor the instant they saw him in his insect form.